Archive for the ‘World of WATCHMEN’ Category

One brief editorial response…

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

This cartoon has been making the rounds on the Internet and I felt compelled to share it here, first of all because it’s exactly the kind of super-nerd fan humour I adore, and also because I think it nicely addresses a point I wanted to make regarding some of WATCHMEN’s detractors…

You see, I read a particularly upsetting review of the film in a college paper yesterday, and I just couldn’t resist abusing the power of this blog to respond to it. Now, I’ve read plenty of negative reviews of WATCHMEN, and while I haven’t entirely agreed with them all, at least they had valid arguments and solid reasoning. Because believe me, there is a strong case against WATCHMEN, and one that we could debate for weeks. This particular review, however, just seemed mean for the sake of being mean…

It opens with the headline, “For a glorified comic book movie, Watchmen takes itself far too seriously.” As I began screaming in outrage (consequently distracting the other people in the library) I realized there are two problems with this headline…

One: In the era of The Dark Knight, Persepolis, A History of Violence, Iron Man, V for Vendetta, and Sin City, there’s no such thing as a “glorified comic book movie.” We win Oscars now, baby! We’re playing in the big leagues. That’s akin to me calling Schindler’s List a “glorified Holocaust movie.” Genres don’t come with inherent quality or prestige – in other words, some genres aren’t better than others – it all depends on what you do with it. So please, get off the high horse…

Two: How can WATCHMEN take itself too seriously? It’s serious stuff by design. That’s like if I complained that Superbad wasn’t a serious, frank discussion about teenage sexuality…. No, worse, it’s like if I complained that Philadelphia took itself too seriously. WATCHMEN is about war – it’s supposed to be serious! The reviewer complains that he was upset by the political ideology of the film’s ending. Good! You’re supposed to be upset! That’s the whole freaking point. I was upset by the end of Old Yeller, but that doesn’t make it a bad movie. Had any of the seriousness or the intense ideological debate been stripped from WATCHMEN, you would have been left with the above cartoon.

And believe me, if the studio had its way…

A Social Experiment in Filmgoing: My Experience Watching WATCHMEN

Monday, March 9th, 2009

wmd-14608-cc

So WATCHMEN has now arrived (to the biggest opening of 2009, no less) and everywhere you turn people are eager to give their expert opinions. Surely you’ve heard it all: for better or worse, it’s incredibly strict in adapting the source material; Jackie Earle Haley is great; the soundtrack is amazing in some spots, poorly used in others; half the cast is inspired, half is not; some think Snyder is a visual genius, others think he’s a fanboy hack; yes, there’s still lots of gigantic blue penis.

So instead of giving my review of WATCHMEN, I thought I’d offer my take on the inherent differences between watching a film about post-modern superheroes and reading a book about post-modern superheroes…

No matter how faithfully Zack Snyder adapted WATCHMEN, the film was never going to be the same as the original, because it’s impossible for a film to feel like a book – it’s a fundamentally different experience. But that doesn’t mean it wasn’t capable of being just as entertaining or enjoyable – it was just going to be so in a different way.

Reading a book (just like writing a book) is one of the most solitary forms of entertainment you can get. It’s just you and the author’s work. You go at your own pace, you make your own interpretations, and you only care about your own experience. The power of a book is that you get to take the material all for yourself and do with it what you will. It’s a private, personal experience.

Film, on the other hand, has always been intended for crowds. Countless theorists have spent lifetimes writing about the societal implications of the theatre. It’s about a group of diverse people cramming into one room and sitting together in the dark and laughing or crying at the same moment. A film is made by a team and it’s watched by a team. As a result, certain other factors come into play when trying to experience a movie.

So allow me to share my experience of watching WATCHMEN in two very different settings…

Two weeks before the film opened, I was invited to attend an industry screening for the studio’s sales department. Naturally, I was losing my mind with excitement. They showed the film at a nice uptown cineplex with clean floors and comfy chairs and a gigantic screen. The theatre was less than half full and populated mostly by rather stuffy business types who kept checking their watches and talking about quarterly numbers as they waited for the movie to start. I sat by myself in an empty row and privately freaked out in anticipation. When the movie finally started, the crowd of businesspeople was not enthused. Not a laugh throughout the theatre (save from me), no astonished gasps (save, of course, from me), not even a round of applause for any of Rorschach’s scene-stealing lines (except, once more, for me…) Instead there were a few scoffs here and there, some impatient groaning at the Leonard Cohen sex scene, and relieved sighs and creaking chairs as people began to leave before the credits even started rolling. These people clearly had no desire to see this film.

So when I left the theatre, I thought, meh. The movie was good, not great, some cool effects, a decent handling of the material, but nothing that changed my life. I went home and clung to my graphic novel and reminded myself of all the things that made me love WATCHMEN in the first place.

One week later, I found myself attending another pre-screening, this one held for fans – both of the graphic novel, and of comic book films in general. This time around they screened the movie in a historic Toronto theatre with less-than-comfortable chairs and the classic-sized screen. The theatre was packed (literally not an empty seat in the house) with people bouncing off the walls in excitement, all of them wearing blood-stained smiley face buttons that had been handed out at the door (and a select few eagerly discussing their plans for the Dr. Manhattan condoms they had been given).

People started cheering as soon as the lights came down. Appreciative laughs began as the opening credits started rolling – some enjoying the multiple references packed within, others enjoying the innovative retooling of the flashback/montage sequence. We roared with applause when Rorschach dropped his classic lines. We squirmed and shrieked at the vat of boiling fat. And when the film ended, we burst into a round of applause that lasted a good minute into Desolation Row.

So when I left the theatre this time I thought, well that’s just the greatest movie ever made. A bunch of us from the screening ended up at a bar afterwards, and we spent a good two hours discussing superhero rape, airships, flamethrowers, Malin Akerman, and the newfound benefits of Leonard Cohen. Even those amongst us who didn’t really like the film still found nice things to say and still seemed to have enjoyed themselves.

So what does this all say?

Well I could go off on a film student rant about Walter Benjamin and Louis Althusser and the Marxist tendencies of the plastic arts, but I’ll try and sum it up in one sentence: WATCHMEN the book is about what superheroes are to you personally, and WATCHMEN the film is about what superheroes are to us collectively… if that makes any sense whatsoever… I guess what I’m trying to say is that the film was all about people who shared a common love for a specific brand of sci-fi coming together to celebrate it, and like most parties, your level of fun depended on who showed up and what mood they were in. Some people were born to love WATCHMEN, and others were born to hate it, and depending on who you listen to, you’ll have a different experience seeing this movie.

It also says that there was enough great stuff in WATCHMEN to convince you that it was an excellent movie and there was enough bad stuff to convince you that it was terrible.

So, if you haven’t seen it yet, get yourself psyched up, find a group of like-minded friends, and go enjoy this movie for what it is, because it’s going to be a long time before something like this comes around again.

Keep your eyes peeled…

Friday, March 6th, 2009

So it’s March 6th and WATCHMEN is finally upon us. Over the weekend I’ll be posting links to reviews as well as my own thoughts on the film, but for now check out my list of hidden treasures to look for while watching the WATCHMEN.

1. Blood-Stained Smileys

This should be a pretty obvious one. Just about every piece of WATCHMEN advertising has been branded with the iconic emblem. There are several obvious instances of this image throughout the film, but there are also a few hidden ones. See if you can spot them all.

2. Purple Pyramids

Can’t say too much about this one without spoiling things, but purple pyramids start popping up in the very first scene. See how many you can count, and keep track of where and when they make an appearance.

3. Veidt Enterprises Advertising Campaigns

Also starting with the very first scene we get glimpses of ads around Manhattan (most notably Veidt’s Nostalgia campaign). Watch to see how these ads change from beginning to end.

4. The Newspaper Stand

The newspaper stand was a big part of the graphic novel. Unfortunately it’s been mostly excised from the film, but it still makes a few key appearances here and there. Try and take note of the characters who pass by.

5. Celebrities!

Remember, it’s 1985. Hidden in the background are dozens of references to mid-80s pop culture, including a bunch of “cameos” from some pretty famous people. See if you can spot David Bowie.

6. S.Q.U.I.D.

This one is a shoutout for fans of the book. We all know that a certain something has been replaced with another certain something… but Snyder had labeled the second certain something “S.Q.U.I.D.” just to show he cares….

Anything I’m missing? Let me know in the comments section!

Words from the Silk Spectre herself!

Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

wm3-notextr

I was lucky enough to take part in a roundtable interview Malin Akerman today. Check out what she had to say about fight training, the awesomeness of Zack Snyder, and the state of the superhero genre!

When asked if she had read WATCHMEN before being cast…

I’m embarrassed to say it, but no, I hadn’t. I had no idea. I was never sort of into the comic book genre… except for the films. You know, I think everyone goes and watches Superman or Batman or Spiderman. But my first introduction to WATCHMEN was through the script, which was phenomenal. I had no idea what just happened to me when I read the script.

On the intense action sequences…

We did 95% of the stunts… They would film us doing it, and then they would film our stunt doubles doing it. Basically, two months before shooting I started a boot camp with an ex-Navy SEAL to try to gain some muscle mass and just kind of feel more like a strong fighter … Our trainer was really meticulous – he really wanted it to be stylized. We trained with our stunt doubles so that we’d get sort of the same style going on. It was crazy, because she would do the sequence and I’d go, “Oh, that’s so cool! I love that! Yeah!” And then I’d go and try to do it and it was so frustrating because it did not look the same at all. You know, she just looked super cool and I just looked like a dumbass trying to fight. But eventually, you know, once you got the hang of it, it felt pretty phenomenal. You felt like the character.

On playing such a revered character…

You know, it’s interesting, that was one of the challenges… Because there is the source material, you not only have the history of your character and the whole story, but you also have the visuals. So just even seeing the body language of her and of the other characters was a challenge and was helpful all at once. Often when you go into a role you know you have to do all the backstories for yourself, and here it was all written for you.

On working with Zack Snyder…

If you meet Zack Snyder, within three minutes you’re sold on whatever he’s selling you, because he’s so passionate, and he’s so smart, and he has such a vision for things that you automatically become enthralled… You know you’ve got a real leader at the helm, which is what you need, especially for something like this… I was sold from minute one.

On how WATCHMEN differs from other comic book movies…

I think that your typical (if I can say “typical”) superhero film is more about good versus evil, it’s a bit more black and white. Whereas I think WATCHMEN is… I almost don’t want to call it a superhero film, because it’s almost its own genre. I mean, it really is more an exploration of human nature at its worst and at its best. And it’s a very grey area. And there’s no true answer.

On the politics of the film…

Of course it is a huge reflection of what’s going on today, which is amazing and sad all at once. But I also think that this novel, had it come out as a film in any time, I think it’s relatable, because life is cyclical. You know, we’ve had wars in the past and unfortunately it looks like we’re going to continue having wars… And I think that that’s a big theme in this movie – war, and how people react to it, and what they do to maintain peace.

On the similarities between Malin and Laurie…

I mean, I do kick ass all the time – my husband loves it! No, I do see a lot of similarities, just because, you know, I think that’s a true phase in everyone’s life at some point, where you are soul searching and kind of figuring out who you are and what you really want in life. And then also trying to find true love. I mean, I think we’ve all been through at least one break-up and one, you know, finding who you think is your true love. So those themes are very relatable for me. And also, I’ve had, at times, a tumultuous relationship with my mother. So, that complicated relationship with Laurie and her mother was really interesting and hit very close to home in many ways.

Sequel Anxiety

Thursday, February 26th, 2009

wfcm-00017

A few months ago, in the vast reaches of the Internet, someone began spreading the rumor that Warner Bros. was considering a WATCHMEN sequel and/or prequel.

For longtime fans of the graphic novel, this is as close to heresy as you can get. Comic book legend Alan Moore only penned 12 issues of WATCHMEN, and they’re all being covered in the upcoming movie. Any further WATCHMEN films would have to rely on content not created by the man himself. This would be akin to a Star Wars film not written by George Lucas (and go ahead, make whatever Phantom Menace jokes you want, but you know what I mean).

Now, I’m not thrilled by the prospect of a sequel, but allow me to play devil’s advocate for a minute.

Is it possible, in any way, shape or form, for a WATCHMEN sequel to be successful?

Maybe…

First let’s look at the idea of a prequel. WATCHMEN takes place in 1985, but frequently references events spanning from 1939 to 1977. There is a massive back-story that’s only seen in glimpses throughout the graphic novel, and people have been toying with taking that back-story and expanding it into a film of its own.

mm-poster-rv2

While this does seem like a tempting idea, I’m not sure it would work. Sure, a prequel would be based heavily on Moore’s original writings and would run less risk of trampling on anything in WATCHMEN, but I think ultimately it would be a little boring. Part of the fun of WATCHMEN is the mystery about these characters’ pasts and how that mystery slowly unravels as you get closer to the end. If you really take your time with the graphic novel, you’ll find that everything you wanted to know about the back-story is already hidden in clever ways. Why ruin the hunt? To me a prequel seems like one big answer key to a Where’s Waldo book.

A sequel, on the other hand, while far more likely to upset fans, has more potential for me. Without spoiling too much, WATCHMEN closes with the characters coming to an understanding that nothing ever ends - the world keeps spinning and things keep changing. As a result, the events of WATCHMEN are left wide open. There are a million different stories that could be told in the wake of this film, and I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t curious about the possibilities.

Now, would I want to see such a film if it wasn’t written by Alan Moore? Probably not. I’m just saying, I think there is a worthy successor to WATCHMEN out there… somewhere…

Pirates: what every good superhero movie needs

Tuesday, February 24th, 2009

If you’ve been following the Internet chatter surrounding WATCHMEN, chances are you’ve heard rumblings about a side project called Tales of the Black Freighter.

For those of you who still haven’t read the graphic novel (and seriously, you should get on that) Tales of the Black Freighter is an elaborate comic-within-a-comic that makes several appearances throughout WATCHMEN. On the first read, it’s kinda difficult to see TotBF’s  relevance to the larger story – after all, it’s a comic book about pirates that serves only to entertain one background character. On closer inspection, however, you can see that TotBF is packed with allusions and metaphors that are deeply tied to larger events. It’s but one of the many gifts for repeat readers.

When it comes to the WATCHMEN film, however, it seems that TotBF didn’t make the final cut… sort of. Instead of being placed in the actual film, TotBF is being released as an animated DVD to serve as a companion piece.

I find this sort of cool… and sort of weird.

It’s cool because this kind of thing usually doesn’t happen. When it comes to adaptations – and especially adaptations of comic books – if the producers think something from the source material is irrelevant, it’s gone. Here, however, we have a middle ground. Most people who see WATCHMEN will appreciate that the seemingly superfluous material was cut, but diehard fans will still have a chance to see their beloved content in a polished and packaged format. Plus, it’s something to hang onto to prolong the WATCHMEN high.

At the same time, though, the animated DVD strikes me as a less-than-perfect idea. The whole point of TotBF is that you’re supposed to compare it to events in the larger WATCHMEN story. You actually need to see the scenes cross-cut and placed side by side for it to work. It’s just the littlest bit impossible to do this with the DVD.

Bottom line: I’m happy to have the bonus content, even if it’s not ideal. And, as an obsessive, raving fan, it’s nice to know that someone out there cares.

But what do you think? Is Tales of the Black Freighter what every good comic book fan deserves, or is it a poor compromise that just won’t satisfy?

Where’s Captain Metropolis?… and other missing pieces

Thursday, February 19th, 2009

wmd-183301This will probably seem like an odd entry considering yesterday’s rant about the viral campaign and Snyder’s respect for detail, but today I want to look at what’s missing from the film.

Fans who have been going over the trailers again and again have begun to notice certain bits and pieces that are notably absent. I was most concerned by Timothy Callahan’s observation that Captain Metropolis seems to have disappeared in the transition from page to screen. (Click here to read Callahan’s article courtesy of Comic Book Resources) Captain Metropolis is a fairly prominent figure in the book who’s responsible for (amongst other things) bringing the various heroes together to form a group.

Now, from an objective film student perspective, I know that the movie can live without Captain Metropolis. He’s important, but not so important that the narrative can’t function without him, and he’s not a major point of identification for the audience. That being said, I still really, really want to see the Captain and his middle-aged paunch shoved into that sweet red jacket. I can’t help it – he’s funny, he’s engaging, and he’s one of the best examples of just how problematic a real-world superhero would be.

But, alas, it looks like I may not get my wish.

Because as much as I may want it to be so, there’s no way everything from the graphic novel can make it into the film. Even with the viral campaign, and even with the Black Freighter DVD (more on that soon!) some things won’t make the cut.

So my question is, when working with a text as critically and commercially successful as WATCHMEN, what’s acceptable to leave out? There’s already been much commotion over the rumored absence of a certain eight-armed beast, but what else needs to be in the film?

As far as I’m concerned, there are only three scenes that need to be in the movie that I haven’t seen proof of yet, and those are the flashbacks explaining the histories of Rorschach, Dr. Manhattan, and the Silk Spectre. These are the scenes that really make the graphic novel for me, and I could see them being glossed over in the film as they’re not directly linked to the overall plot. So I’m keeping my fingers crossed…

But what about you? In the comments section below tell us what you think needs to be in the WATCHMEN movie.

Some Viral Fun

Wednesday, February 18th, 2009

There’s nothing I love more than a good viral campaign. There’s something incredibly fun (and possibly juvenile…) about dragging the world of the movies out of the theatre and into our own.

So naturally I’ve been following the WATCHMEN campaign like a hawk.

You see, the graphic novel originally came with its own viral campaign of sorts. One of the amazing and innovative things about WATCHMEN was the inclusion of “primary documents” scattered throughout the book. At the end of each issue you were treated to an excerpt from Nite Owl’s tell-all memoirs, or part of Sally Jupiter’s scrapbook, or Rorschach’s police report, and so on and so forth. These cool little bonuses helped establish the world of the comic and built on the overall experience.

Now obviously it would be close to impossible to include these documents in the film - but that’s what the good ol’ Internet is for. Warner Bros. has set up an awesome viral campaign that provides a lot of the info from the WATCHMEN documents in really fun, first-hand ways.

For starters, check out the Keene Act PSA posted above to learn how you can help stop the vigilante threat! Then head over to www.thenewfrontiersman.net to read clippings from a New York tabloid ripped right from the pages of the graphic novel. Finally, head over to www.i-watch-the-watchmen.com to download all the WATCHMEN content you could possibly want, be it for your iPhone, desktop, facebook profile, or website.

This viral campaign is one of the reasons I’m convinced we do indeed need a WATCHMEN movie. Not only is it proof that the studio is taking care to respect all the detail from the graphic novel, but it also gives you the chance to experience the story in a whole new way. I’ve been waiting years to see something like the Keene Act PSA.

Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to change my profile pic to Dr. Manhattan and yell at any friends who don’t immediately comment.

WATCHMEN Comes Home

Wednesday, February 18th, 2009

Big news for any Home users out there – director Zack Snyder and graphic artist Dave Gibbons will be holding a live interview in the virtual world on February 23rd. Also be sure to keep your eyes open for new WATCHMEN content including t-shirts, costumes, and doomsday clocks.

Click here for more info.